this boy who refused to apologised stir the shit more when he said it was not necessary to apologise for protecting the party, religion, race and country. also, i just heard on tv3 nightline (midnight news), he was shouting “there is no need to apologise for defending UMNO”. (or something like that).
whoa! see, right from the horse’s mouth – “defending UMNO” (plus islam and malay too) – so this means what he said was NOT misconstructed at all! he really meant it that the chinese community will take advantage of UMNO if UMNO is weak – he gave the proof now that he said there is no need to apologise since he was defending UMNO.
whoa! nice move, boy, nice! can’t he at least said “there is no need to apologise because my intention is not to hurt/offend the chinese community.” or “there is no need to apologise because the media had twisted what i said.” ?… BUT he said there is no need to apologise for defending UMNO… which of course tells us that what he had said was in defence of UMNO, thus he really meant that the chinese community would take advantage of UMNO if UMNO is weak.
and you know what? all the boy’s daddy-in-law could say was that his boy-boy ought to clarify his remarks as his remarks might differ from what that had been reported in the media. oh great. blame the media again. like father-in-law, like son-in-law.
NOTE: ok ok, i hear some of you barked at me “don’t be silly, lucia. the boy would never never ever apologise lah!.”
yeah, lindsay anderson said so too. 🙂
what the boy’s chief said.
what MCA wanita deputy chief said.
the boy championing so hard for the malays
MCA youth and wanita assemblies debating on the boy’s remark
finally, do read aisehman’s take on this apology issue… and of course the sensintrovert one too.