TEOH BENG HOCK DID NOT COMMIT SUICIDE!!!
Post on Aug.19, 2009
’sign still points to suicide, says second pathologist’.
oh no! not again! this time, the second pathologist, an indian nationality pathologist, testified at the inquest that teoh beng hock committed suicide.
what? not another one that had been bought over?
no way i’m going to believe teoh committed suicide. NO NO NO!
TEOH BENG HOCK DID NOT COMMIT SUICIDE!
i believe many of us does not believe he committed suicide. you know, at yesterday’s DAP dinner where nizar was one of the speaker, i remember he said (from video) that once somewhere an indonesian fell 10 storey or so and his eyes popped out! he meant to hint that at such a high fall, the injuries to the body will be massive but in teoh’s case, no!
There were no signs of strangulation around Teoh’s neck to suggest he was stopped from breathing, no “cyanosis” or as he explained “no blue-ish discolouration of the fingertips which are normally found in asphyxial deaths”, no restraining marks, no tongue wounds to suggest Teoh may have bit his tongue while struggling or any other defence wounds.
He also noted that the results of a toxicology test had come back negative, showing no traces of alcohol or common drugs.
“It rules out the victim could have been drugged and maybe then thrown off the window and also rules out the eventuality of having an accidental fall,” the pathologist who had made national news here after his independent autopsy report on the controversial death of suspected car-thief A. Kugan revealed he died from injuries resulting from beating while under police custody.
so those MACC bastards officers did not strangled or drugged him…. but they could have forced him to jump! remember , he was only one person while those MACC bastards – i’m being too kind to call them ‘bastards’ actually. go to ktemoc post and see what he called them… of which i also joined in actually) – ok where was i? yes it was teoh akk alone… just one person against how many? 3? 5? 8? of those MACC bastards interrogating him. they could have surrounded him and forced him to jump. poor teoh. no way out for him. one side was the window, the other side were those bastards MACC officers.
the first pathologist, khairul, was the government pathologist…. and what do you know… this second pathologist was called in by the police!
The 42-year-old lecturer in forensic pathology at the Universiti Malaysia Medical Centre (UMMC) had been enlisted by the police investigation team to carry out the autopsy on Teoh with government pathologist Dr Khairul Aznam Ibrahim.
police? the polis raja di malaysia? like the MACC, the police is under the UMNO government’s thumb, so how do we expect to believe both of them?
i really hope the selangor government will bring in the famous (and flamboyant) thai pahtologist, pornthip rojana-sunand. it was reported:
One of her most memorable cases is the one involving a politician in 1999, which Thai police had initially classified as suicide.
After conducting a post-mortem on the victim and closely examining the scene of the death, Dr Pornthip concluded that the man was actually clubbed on the head before being shot.
The case was re-opened and the man’s brother was later charged with his murder.
see? politician. suicide. same pattern as teoh beng hock’s case. she should be here! she should be here, being an ‘outsider’. we already had 2 ‘insider’ pathologist – one under the federal government (umno!) and one under the police (umno controlled!), so it is only fair to have an outsider pathologist’s view.
before i end, remember i pointed out to you dr rafick’s CSI findings (8 parts)? here are another 3 parts. read especially part IX where dr rafick is determined that teoh did not commit suicide.
dr rafick’s CSI findings part IX
dr rafick’s CSI findings part X
dr rafick’s CSI findings part XI
Filed in government, malaysia, politics















August 19th, 2009 on 2:22 AM
.
There are many ways to incapacitate a person and not necessary by strangulation or drugs as the useless second pathology wanted us to believe in. How naive he must be thinking that he could fool the people with such nonsense.
After Kugan’s second post moderm, this pathology has no more relevance – perhaps he was bribed or threatened only god knows.
His testimony only heightened the fact that Teoh was murdered. His testimony – that Teoh’s death was a suicide – was only a desperation called – “last resort” to deflect Teoh’s death as murder and hoping to exonerate the murderer(s).
Those in unmo who made the loudest noise after Teoh was found dead were the ones in the knowing.
(pls do delete if deemed inappropriate)
.
August 19th, 2009 on 9:54 AM
If someone desperately wants to commit suicide, I suspect through the MACC’s office window would be his last choice.
Maybe, we can have 2 live men, one who jumps and one being thrown, to really have a true picture of how their injuries differ.
But I believe,MT did show some photos sometime back. But then,CSI bolehland syle is to beat about the bush, having all insignificant witnesses to blur what is important.
This inquiry it seems from the onset is base on suicide theory. From day one,statements from all and sundry, friends and relatives were taken maybe just to fit the suicide scenario.
I just wonder, it seems all or most contacts in the deceased cell phones were interviewed, but how about all those personnel present at the crime scene that day and during interrogation? Their contacts, their movements,
their phone records, emails and movements after the fact,was there any follow ups?
August 19th, 2009 on 12:16 PM
Justme: “..But then,CSI bolehland syle is to beat about the bush, having all insignificant witnesses to blur what is important.”
Exactly, these two dubious pathologists have become court jesters selling the same fish(red herrings). Except that the “joke” is not funny at all.
Now its is openly displayed to the world, how the medical profession is ALSO that steep in decadence.
August 20th, 2009 on 1:35 AM
oA
i see no reason at all to delete your comment. i only delete comments that are very offensive and vulgar and oh well… very very racist.
anyway i agree with you that they are trying to deflect teoh’s death as murder so that those bastards MACC officers can escape!
justme
you are right. since day the inquiry was based on suicide, hence those witnesses seemed to be bias, coming up with evidences that points to sucide!
wits
sad eh… now it is the medical profession.
August 20th, 2009 on 1:48 AM
.
Can you all remember how the no. 1 idiot was feeling so smug a couple of days after Teoh was murdered.
What give was that he rather bet on a football match rather than showing his concern for the country for whatever transpired in Teoh’s death.
The only reasonable explanation for his action then would be that he thought he did a “remarkable ‘chess’ move” by killing Teoh which would led to dispute btw. DAP and PKR and eventually the demise of PR.
Selangor would then be reverted back to unmo.
Teoh’s murder was by no mean a political motivated one. It is that obvious.
.