dr m for peace prize?
i did a double take when i saw this heading in the star paper – ‘dr m nominated for nobel prize‘. did i read right? i read again, blink my eyes, rub my eyes, and sure enough, yes it did says dr m was nominated for the nobel peace prize.
huh? why did i find that hard to believe? well, dr m would be the last person on earth for me to imagine getting the nobel peace prize. look at his 22 years of being the PM – was he a man of peace? oh well, but he was nominated for what he did for bosnia-herzegovina…. nothing to do with our own country.
i don’t know what criteria one must have (have done) to be nominated. is it just based on one incident/happenings? don’t have to see the works/acts of the person on the whole? if it is the latter, then surely dr m should not be nominated at all! i guess it is the former. in that case, the nobel peace award wouldn’t be consider prestigious to me anymore.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.