abdul razak baginda – framed, as his wife insisted?

so abdul razak baginda (picture) had been charged with abetment to murder, while the 2 policemen had been charged with murder.

some people questioned how come he was charged with ‘abetment to murder’ and not ‘murder’ since he is the key figure behind this mongolian woman, altantuya shaariibuu case, the one ‘behind’ the murder, the one who instruct the two policemen to murder her.

well i suppose that’s how our law works? if you do not actually, directly kill a person, it is only abetment.

no matter, this is of no urgency. now, let’s look at razak’s wife who insists on her husband’s innocence. we should too… for the moment think that he might be innocent… since it is always guilty until proven innocentinnocent until proven guilty, right?

i find it strange at first that if it is her husband had an affair with altantuya, why is she so protective of the husband? unless she knows something we don’t, like as she stated, her husband was being set up (framed).

at her outburst in court, she was heard to say:

“He is a good man. He is not the Prime Minister of this country. He doesn’t want to be one. He is not interested in all that.”

aha! i find it interesting why she mentioned that her husband is not the PM, when of course we all know he is not. ahh… but the more interesting part come after that – “he doesn’t want to be one.” don’t you think this fits in perfectly with her assertion of her husband being framed? you know… “do this for me and i’ll make sure one day you can become the PM or the DPM”.

let’s look at who is this razak baginda. here is a picture taken from sun2surf with info on razak (and altantuya too):

he is a well known political analyst in our country. when right in the beginning, news of his involvement in the murder came out, i read somewhere (forgot where… star or sun) on his profile too, and it was also mentioned that he is a close ally of our DPM, and the DPM was instrumental in pushing up his career and status as he is now.