lies and deception
Post on Apr.08, 2006
one of the greatest and most well-known miracle of jesus christ is when he ‘walked on water/sea’. it was in the bible and of course christians believe in the bible.
however, recently, a professor in a florida, US university, after a study, claimed that jesus did not walk on water but he was walking on a thin piece of ice, thus refuting the miracle of jesus walking on water.
The study found that a period of cooler temperatures in the area between 1,500 and 2,600 years ago could have included the decades in which Jesus lived.
A drop in temperature below freezing could have caused ice thick enough to support a human to form on the surface of the freshwater lake near the western shore, Nof said. It might have been nearly impossible for distant observers to see a piece of floating ice surrounded by water.
this same professor, 14 years ago, also threw a damper on the miracle of the parting of the red sea, by explaining how the wind and sea could cause the parting, not a miracle that caused it.
oh well, he could be an eccentric professor for all i know. how many people are going to believe him? not many, i’m sure. he had said to been receiving lots of hate mail after he presented these two theories.
i guess some people have nothing better to do than to ‘find trouble’ on other people’s faith. well, i can’t imagine what would happen if this professor or some other nut make claims that the prophet mohammad did not do this or that as stated in the koran – riots and burning down of buildings (from the extremists)? order to kill the professor?
i’m strong in my own faith. no matter what other people say of my own faith, i will not be swayed. i will not get all worked up. i believe in what i want to believe in and nobody (or whatever actions i intend to do… IF) could change that.
just like when dan brown’s book ‘the da vinci code‘ was out, some people get all worked up and grumbled they were all lies in the book. oh well, lies or no lies, whatever, to me, it’s just a fiction.
i’m sure many of you knew already that soon a movie (starring tom hanks) based on this book will be out soon, right?
A South Korean Christian group has filed for a court injunction to stop a movie distributor from showing The Da Vinci Code, saying it defiles the sanctity of Jesus Christ and distorts facts.
“The Da Vinci Code is a movie which belittles and tries to destroy Christianity,” said the Rev Hong Jae-chul of the Christian Council of Korea, an umbrella group of over 60 Korean Protestant denominations.
aiya. who cares. it’s just a movie.
anyway, as i had blog before, there is now a website ‘jesus decoded‘, which is aimed at providing accurate information on jesus, catholic teachings and varioius topics explored in the da vinci code book. among other things, the website introduced an hour-long documentary on DVD that:
presents clear and accurate information about the person of Jesus, his disciples, and the formation of the books included in the official canon of the bible.
this DVD is produced by the catholic communication campaign.now, we also see another DVD coming up, entittled ‘the da vinci code deception‘.
it’s good to see that we have people who bother to come up with ways to counter-attack dan brown’s points in his book. this is a creative non violent way to protest/attack!
Filed in Uncategorized, news, religion
















April 8th, 2006 on 2:42 AM
He’s from the Global Warming genre, mah. The “type B scientist” who tells you what you actually experience. See a Yeti or a n UFO and they’ll tell you what you saw! Not what you actually saw. Junk science impresses dumb reporters. Beware of post modern professors naturally.
Miracles of course are possible but by themselves are not necessarily drectly equated with holy spiritual attainment. Supernormal powers are cultivateable in tandem with the person mind’s cultivation on the way to enlightenment but such powers can also be corrupting to the person who gains them. Many such phenomena as walking through rock or flying in the air etc etc etc are mentioned in the books on Buddhist meditation too. Many of these however are temporary alteration of the physical reality in which we are bound.
Type B scientists and post modern professors are uncomfortable with any other ideas that threatens their warm seats and present status. Human nature. That which they cannot explain, they try to dismiss by denigrating by all means. The way to make a name.
lucia: oic. there is such a person as ‘type B scientists? didn’t know what. what an eye opener your commentse here!
April 8th, 2006 on 3:10 AM
Aiyoh, who cares…the bible/torah/quran/(insert all other religious books) are just books.
They are all fictions.
lucia: i care… because i’m a die-hard christian and the bible is the word of god to me, not fiction.Â
April 8th, 2006 on 5:07 AM
There’s so many people it’s not really surprising to find a skeptic who thinks he can find a scientific answer to everything. Anyways, his suggestions doesn’t seem to be plausible too, in my opinion.
Btw Lucia, very nice blog design!
lucia: thanks andy. i picked this design after hours of studying all the other designs.
it’s true what you said that there are so many people out there so of course there’s bound to be some skeptics. oh… and also this reminds me, there’s so many people out on the net too and there’s bound to be a troll coming in your blog one day… i think one had enter my blog. (no, not you).
Â
April 8th, 2006 on 10:41 AM
of course it could’ve been ice, but, you know, the bible would’ve said ‘ice’ had it – really – been ice. such pretentious desperation these people have at refuting the bible that they fail to see simple fallacies in their arguments.
and naivE’s rather naive. ha-ha.
lucia: agree about the naivE and naive part.
Â
April 8th, 2006 on 1:11 PM
Often it’s simply not the simple atheists’ hand at it in the US but that of the Marxist leftist clones out to discredit the Judeo-Christian ethos as a means by way of weakening the government of the day as well. Insidious and not always apparent.
April 8th, 2006 on 8:48 PM
yourgod forgets that ultimately the judgement of any religion will be made thus:
1. The tree is known by his fruit – by way of mass effects and collective actions of the adherents historically.
2. Within the confine of Monotheism, one might say that the only way we humans can experience God is through love. A religion is true to the extent that it teaches love and is false to the extent that it instills hate.
3. Brainwashing notwithstanding a religion has to be a Persuasion in that its doctrines must allow anyone whose hearts no longer believes in it to leave freely. Failing which it is as good only as any cult.
Try not to compare oranges with apples. Even Buddhist teachings have its faults wrt close examination but there is this written Charter of Universal Intellectual Freedom provided by way of its Kalama Sutra.
Being an atheist is easy but everything don’t begin and end there. The urge and inner calling will still nag in oneself to understand the Nature of Reality. Understandably what men has commited in the name of religion stinks. Man is often stricken by foibles and ignorance, inside and outside of religion.
I do make jokes and jibes even at any Persuasions but only when it is grossly distorted in spirit imo. When I look at the Ten Commandments closely, I find some 7 good and universal injuctions and 3 lousy ones.
So do we throw the baby out with the bath water and find bliss from that? the thrust of Darwinism did just that but now his missing link theory wears more and more thin. His amoral Theory only promoted hoplesness and Nihilism.
April 8th, 2006 on 11:46 PM
you are a diehard christian. I am also a christian but I would read and try to understand. It is profound knowledge from research. It won’t change my belief in God. It will help me understand my religion better.
lucia: yes of course it is profound knowledge. a professor or scientist, doing research or study – all these has to be profound knowledge. i don’t mind reading it too… but if i don’t believe it, how can i understand it, understand the study i mean? but of course OTOH it help me to understand MY OWN religion better.
April 9th, 2006 on 4:51 PM
I wouldn’t seethe too much about Evangelists ; one can show them the door. These sort of guys otoh are unlikely to take ‘no’, for an answer:
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/pictures/20060408FatahFuneral01.jpg
When a tiger is about to eat you why make a fuss over a domesticated cat?
April 9th, 2006 on 4:56 PM
“what maybe nice to u doesn’t mean it’ll be nice to others ”
Heheh, I wouldn’t use sophistry sparingly for in excess one is tarred by it.
April 9th, 2006 on 5:08 PM
Correction: “I would use sophistry sparingly….”